Pitting parking against downtown development

Wednesday June 10, 2009

By Vivian Belik

Tom Patrick/Yukon News

WHITEHORSE004
City officials presented plans to reduce the parking requirements associated with new building construction in Whitehorse.

The city wants to make erecting buildings easier and parking harder.

Monday, during a open house on parking and increasing density downtown, officials presented plans to reduce the parking requirements associated with new building construction.

Currently, downtown developers must provide parking spaces within a 100-metre radius of a building.

The city has proposed changing this to 300 metres.

“Rather than empty parking lots, we’d like to see more development,” said Ben Campbell, city planner.

And, if you want to change your building’s designation to commercial from residential, you could dodge, or limit the existing parking stall requirements if the city plan is approved.

Last spring, the Bonanza Hotel owners successfully lobbied the city to reduce the building’s parking footprint when they created more office and retail space in the former Taku Bar.

“It’s a lot of money,” said Campbell. Coast Mountain Sports would have needed roughly 17 new stalls and each parking stall can cost about $18,000.”

The parking requirement didn’t exist before 1991, said Campbell.

“We’re just going back to the way things used to be,” he said.

But the idea of changing parking requirements left some people at the open house wondering where they would leave their car when they came downtown.

“I think these (parking amendments) will drive people away from stores,” said Bruce Ross.

“The downtown is where people meet each other and if you want people to come downtown then you need to provide buildings with parking. This will kill the downtown, it’s been happening all across Canada” he said.

But it may just be a perceived lack of parking said Campbell.

“We just want to remove financial barriers for developers and increase development downtown. We’re not taking away any stalls.”

The city is also considering changing the zoning for the area bounded by First and Fifth avenues and Ray Street and Black Street.

In a previous public-input sessio

Bookmark and Share 4 Comments

6:09pm 06/16/09  |  chips wrote:

just think about downtown Vancouver cutting by half its on street parking!!
Yukoners are just used to parking with in spitting distance of there destination.
Underground, multi-level and roof top parking is the only solution. not big parking lots like the ship yards parking expanse, by the way is there a dock at the “ship” yards park? or am i out of luck parking my boat too?

6:41pm 06/11/09  |  vividone wrote:

So for those of us who work downtown and already find it difficult to find parking, experience high paid lot costs or regular parking fines just so that we can be at work…....I guess we no longer will have a place to park.  What about handicapped and people with disabilities are they just supposed to walk? The city should invest in a public parking structure that has levels like other places in Canada so that parking is still available for customers and people who work and live downtown

4:39pm 06/10/09  |  yukoner44 wrote:

there a space here space had to park my car in wolf creek to come to whitehorse.
there a space there a space the the city took them all

4:18pm 06/10/09  |  soldierpiper wrote:

Lets hope the parking problem gets worked out.I only go to stores that have parking.

Add a comment

The Yukon News has provided readers with the opportunity to post their views and opinions regarding any stories published on its website to foster dynamic discussions. Posts will be reviewed by a moderator before being published, but will not be edited or altered except for spelling and grammatical errors. Comments on this site are not the opinions of the Yukon News and comments with personal attacks, vulgar language, libelous statements or falsified facts will not be permitted. Only registered users of the website can contribute to the online conversations.

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.