Teachers look down strike path
Wednesday January 20, 2010
Mike Thomas/Yukon News
Yukon’s teachers face a big decision today.
They stand at a fork in the road, and one path, which their union leadership is urging them to head down, looks like it will lead to a strike.
The other route would bring collective negotiations to a peaceful end with an Ottawa-appointed arbitrator drawing up a binding deal.
Teachers will today cast ballots either in favour of the first option, known as conciliation, or the second, known as binding arbitration.
The teachers’ last collective agreement, which remains in effect, expired on June 30.
Despite protests to the contrary by Katherine Mackwood, president of the Yukon Teachers’ Association, teachers privately acknowledge that the current deadlock in negotiations boils down to money.
Teachers want annual wage increases of 4.5 per cent over two years. The territory is offering them 1.2 per cent annually, up from the government’s initial, pre-mediation offer of just one per cent annually.
Territorial negotiators are pleading poverty. Union representatives don’t buy it, and are calling on their members to fight back.
At a union meeting in the Whitehorse Westmark on Saturday, negotiators urged teachers to vote for conciliation. They acknowledged this would lead to a strike vote, and suggested that members ought to have three months’ savings stuffed away in case job action drags out.
As evidence that the territory can afford a better deal for teachers, union representatives point out that the Yukon’s public books, released in September, show the territory has $135 million in the bank.
However, those numbers don’t account for the latest spending splurge announced in November by Premier Dennis Fentie. The territory now anticipates to post a modest surplus of $220,000.
And the fact that the territory’s Crown corporations are privately borrowing more than $120 million to finance new construction projects may indicate that the government is running out of money.
If the territory is facing a cash pinch, it has more to worry about than negotiations with the teachers’ union, which represents about 750 members.
Next month, bargaining begins with the Yukon Employees’ Union, which has a membership more than five times as large, at around 4,000 employees. There will be far more at stake when these talks begin. This may help explain the government’s hard-line approach in its talks with the teachers’ union.
Yukon’s teachers insist their wage demands are in line with their counterparts in neighbouring jurisdictions. They point to teachers in the Northwest Territories, who received annual salary hikes of 4.5 per cent over three years in their last agreement, struck in May of 2008.
However, as it stands, Yukon’s teachers still enjoy the third-highest salaries in the country, lagging only behind their peers in the Northwest Territories and Nunavut.
And Yukoners, as a whole, enjoy less isolation, lower costs of living and better qualities of life than what’s found in Canada’s other territories.
A newly qualified teacher in the Yukon starts with an annual salary of $57,398. Wages top out at $91,751 for teachers with a master’s degree and a decade of experience.
Some teachers see the government’s low-ball offer as a provocation. But as they cast ballots today, educators will be asking themselves whether a strike is a fight they can win.
School strikes are divisive at the best of times, as some parents see themselves being held hostage by monopolistic public unions.
And as the country struggles to pull itself out of the recession, even Yukoners, who were largely insulated from the market crash, may have less sympathy than usual for striking government workers.
And Premier Fentie is at his most adept when he’s in a mudfight. Given how his reputation has been tarnished by a string of scandals over the past year, Fentie may even welcome a strike, if it offers him a chance to brand himself as the champion of the territory’s children.
Whether teachers are willing to strike over the size of their paycheques should be clear in the next day or so.
Contact John Thompson at (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).









9:20pm 01/21/10 | Dan Davidson wrote:
The dispute is going to arbitration, so now everyone can stop worrying.
8:07pm 01/21/10 | soldierpiper wrote:
A very informative article,I think that 9% is far to high,compared to the rest of the country with far bigger class rooms & work loads no doubt.A very sweet deal for teachers here in the Yukon.
6:02pm 01/21/10 | Dan Davidson wrote:
Now you’re just being silly. During the summer I was frequently in summer school, upgrading. No pay in the summer. The “holidays” I referred to as far as working was concerned were Christmas to New Years and March Break. Also no pay. Clear now?
11:20am 01/21/10 | bfast wrote:
Dan Davidson, “During those holidays you refer to, I was usually either making up or marking examinations.” Yeah, sure. You made up or marked exams all summer. How did you pull that off? Did you give kids their grades before you marked the exams?
10:02am 01/21/10 | Dan Davidson wrote:
Not at all. The number of school days and hours of class time do vary somewhat from school to school, but I spent my 32 years being paid for the approx. 5 hours of class time plus about 3 hours of meetings, marking and preparation time. It was rarely enough time to get the job done so I took work home and also worked a lot on the weekends. During those holidays you refer to, I was usually either making up or marking examinations.
8:32am 01/21/10 | bfast wrote:
Dan Davidson, “They are paid for the days they are actually in the classroom or working somewhere with students.”
Are you saying that seeing as teachers aren’t in school for the two months of summer and another month between christmas and spring breaks, that top teacher’s salaries are really only $68,813 (9/12 of $91,751)? Or are you saying that the top teachers are really earning a ‘full-time adjusted’ salary of $122,334 (12/9ths of $91,751)?
4:08pm 01/20/10 | Dan Davidson wrote:
A typical misunderstanding. Teachers don’t get holidays. They are paid for the days they are actually in the classroom or working somewhere with students. A day when there is a school holiday is never a “paid holiday” for educators. It’s simply amazing how many people don’t know this. As for professional development days, I believe there are three of these built into each school’s yearly calendar, one of the lowest numbers in the country.
2:01pm 01/20/10 | bobvibert wrote:
So what else is news? Ever see them work for a living? I sure have not? Always taking hollidays, pro development time off, etc.
Add a comment
The Yukon News has provided readers with the opportunity to post their views and opinions regarding any stories published on its website to foster dynamic discussions. Posts will be reviewed by a moderator before being published, but will not be edited or altered except for spelling and grammatical errors. Comments on this site are not the opinions of the Yukon News and comments with personal attacks, vulgar language, libelous statements or falsified facts will not be permitted. Only registered users of the website can contribute to the online conversations.
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.