Chamber calls for housing action
Ian Stewart/Yukon News

Property prices and rental rates in Whitehorse are at their highest ever.
Itâs been more than a year since the Whitehorse Chamber of Commerce made a series of recommendations on how to address the housing crisis.
Thirteen months later, not much has changed, said president Rick Karp. âWe predicted last year that 2012 was going to be worse than ever, and it is,â he said.
Property prices and rental rates have never been higher, while vacancy rates, hovering around one percent, have never been lower.
âThe city needs hundreds of new affordable rental units,â said Karp.
An uptick in public drunkenness, vandalism and panhandling in downtown Whitehorse is the result, he said. A recent survey conducted by the chamber found 60 per cent of businesses encountered these problems.
âItâs those that need the help, lashing out saying, âsolve this problem, do something,ââ said Karp.
Municipal and territorial governments have made some efforts to address the housing problem.
Last year the city, following one of the chamberâs recommendations, passed an incentive program of tax grants for developers looking to build rental units.
While Karp said he didnât think that the cityâs incentive program went far enough, his harshest criticism was reserved for the territorial government for botching the sale of lot 262.
The 10-acre parcel of land on the corner of Mountainview Drive and Range Road was put out for tender this spring.
It was supposed to be the Yukon Partyâs centerpiece solution to the cityâs affordable housing woes. Housing Minister Scott Kent frequently referred to the project while fending off opposition criticism during the last legislative sitting.
The lot was to be sold to the highest bidder on the condition that at least 30 affordable housing units be built on the land.
But by the time the tender closed on April 27 only two bids were received, one for $100 and the other for $10,000. Both bids were later disqualified, because they required that the government help pay for the affordable housing units.
Karp wouldnât say if grants were needed to spur on private development. But with the territorial government still sitting on $13.5 million in federal affordable-housing money, he said there should be no shortage of funds for whatever scheme they come up with.
Territorial officials are now having informal discussions with developers to see why the process didnât work, said Colin McDowell, the director of land management for the Yukon government.
He couldnât say when the government would release a new tender for the lot.
âI would assume that once we review the options and get senior management input and political input weâd have a set of marching orders and it would be more quick than slow,â he said.
In Karpâs view, the entire tendering system has to be revamped.
âThe whole process around wasnât really functional,â he said. âThey listened yet they didnât listen.
âThe way the request for proposal was worded basically discounted anyone who was serious to put on a serious bid on developing something there.â
Done right, a deal with a developer would produce â300, not 30,â affordable rental units, said Karp.
âWe have local developers who are ready to go on this to resolve this issue. We just need to do it.â
But with summer fast approaching, the window to build this season is closing soon.
âWe have to do whatever it takes to get those units up. We have to restore the mobility in the housing market,â said Karp. âThis is not something that we can ignore, this is something that we have to act on and we have to act on it quickly.â
Contact Josh Kerr at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
2 Comments
What is a typical affordable rental unit?
I am glad the government is not giving away the land, plus providing grants to private developers for this project. Keep up the good work! Yes, look for other solutions but do not cave to a give-away program where the developers have every intention of making good profits (nothing wrong with that), while getting something for nothing from the tax payer. That’s how I see it.
Add a comment