Yukon News

Beta 3.0

Chinook run shaping up to be a disaster

Jacqueline Ronson Wednesday July 18, 2012

The Alaskan governor has urged the U.S. Secretary of Commerce to declare a fishery disaster on the Yukon River.

Sean Parnell pressed the office to make the declaration for both 2011 and 2012.

Last year, the commercial fishery of chinook salmon on the Yukon River was completely shut down and subsistence harvest was greatly restricted. This year is looking even worse.

The Secretary of Commerce has already declared the 2009 season a disaster for the fishery.

While the final counts for this season are not in yet, almost all of the chinook that will enter the Yukon River this year have done so, and the numbers are the worst on record.

As of July 16, 104,000 fish had been counted at the Pilot Station sonar counter near the mouth of the river. That’s down from an average count of 146,000 at this time, and an average count of 135,300 in years when the run is late, as it was this year.

The Alaska Department of Fish and Game has restricted the times where subsistence fishing is allowed in order to protect the run and help meet their border obligations and escapement goals.

Every Tuesday through the summer, representatives from communities along the Yukon River and fishery officials on both sides of the border join a teleconference to hear about how the fish run is doing from the people on the ground.

This week, many Alaska communities reported that they could not fish even when allowed to do so because of high water levels and floating debris.

Some said that they have harvested less than half of the chinook required to meet their community’s subsistence need, but that they have stopped fishing for chinook and will wait until the fall chum run, which is expected to be strong.

Meanwhile in Canada, First Nation communities along the Yukon River are still waiting to see how many fish will reach them this year.

“Until we see the numbers coming across the border, we’re not sure what impact those management measures (by the Alaskan government) will have had on the run,” said Mary Ellen Jarvis with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans.

Cutting fishing times by half will not necessarily result in a 50 per cent reduction in harvest, because communities could fish harder during the available openings, Jarvis said.

The first chinook reached the Eagle sonar counter, just below the Canadian border, on July 2. As of July 16, 600 fish had been counted.

In previous years an average of 7,500 fish had reached the counter by that date.

While things are not looking good, no radical management decisions will be taken until we have a better idea of how many fish will make it across the border, Jarvis said.

“We certainly have put First Nations on alert that we are trying to take a very conservative approach until we have that information.”

That means that First Nation fisheries are being asked to hold off the early fish if possible and wait to see how the run is doing.

Here in the Yukon, First Nations have the authority to manage their own fishing activity. They do so in co-operation with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans under “voluntary community-based management,” Jarvis said.

In past years, First Nations have introduced various measures to restrict their harvest, including reducing fishing times, reducing the harvest, or authorizing elders-only fish camps.

These management techniques have been successful in the past, Jarvis said.

However, if the run starts to look any worse than it does right now, officials could consider shutting down the fishery entirely.

“Ultimately DFO does have the authority to manage the fishery for Canada,” Jarvis said.

Through an amendment to community licences, the department could outlaw fishing altogether, and that decision would be enforceable.

This extreme measure has never been taken in the past, and is “not somewhere we want to go,” Jarvis said.

Contact Jacqueline Ronson at

.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

6 Comments

Joe Jackson wrote:
9:08am Thursday July 26, 2012

The ADF&G is inept in many of it’s forecasts. The Dept. has a lack of creativity and is stuck in the -“going by the book” attitude.  The Shellfish Observer program is a perfect example of that. Data is collected for the sake of Data. It fills the computer and keeps the brain dead fish accountants busy at their desks. The paperwork become the focus 1=1=2, instead of reality and common sense.  ADF&G has lost touch with reality and if there is not a number to be crunched or a rule to be enforced they are lost. Clearly they have become number robots.

Bubba wrote:
10:15pm Tuesday July 24, 2012

I do agree that the Americans take far too many liberities with our fish, their entire idea of a subsistence fishery for everyone is absurd.  They believe that all the fish in the Yukon River belong to them and that is just plain wrong.  If I was travelling thru the states and stopped to eat a sandwich does that make me an american.

I do still believe that the real problem exsists out in the Bering Sea, but yes, when it comes to river management we always get the short end of the stick thanks to our American counterparts.

kingfisher wrote:
7:42pm Tuesday July 24, 2012

Bubba

Just wait and see for what actually enters Canada. The goal will not be achieved. In a poor year the fishers in the US thought only of themselves and our spawning gounds will be pretty lonely. When will it change? When is a crisis a true crisis and when is a crisis just a crude joke because of greedy people and inept management?

kingfisher wrote:
7:40pm Tuesday July 24, 2012

Bubba

Just wait, the run forecast was poor but enough Chinook got into the river to meet the spawning escapement goals. US managers initiated measures to target summer chum so the people would have some fish- and the people used this opportunity to take their beloved Chinook.

Just wait and see for what actually enters Canada. The goal will not be achieved. In a poor year the fishers in the US thought only of themselves and our spawning gounds will be pretty lonely. When will it change? When is a crisis a true crisis and when is a crisis just a crude joke because of greedy people and inept management?

Bubba wrote:
2:51am Tuesday July 24, 2012

You do realize that, that is a photo of a chum salmon dont you?

The decreased numbers in the salmon populations in the Yukon River are not a result of the fisheries in the river.  The fisheries on the River, both American and Canadian are heavily managed and there have been strict regulations (more so in Canadian waters) for years. 
The problem that is affecting Yukon River salmon populations is occuring in the Bering Sea and the biggest problem affecting the salmon populations in the Bering Sea is CLIMATE CHANGE.  The conditions in the Bering Sea are changing and affecting the ability of these fish to survive.  The second largest problem is mismanaged fisheries in the Bering Sea especially those that target other species like pollack and catch salmon as by-catch.  The number of salmon that are caught in other fisheries in the Bering Sea are not recorded and monitored properly and quickly becoming a major issue affecting the survival of Chinook Salmon.

kingfisher wrote:
12:14am Thursday July 19, 2012

What is causing the Yukon Chinook salmon crisis, noone seems to know- conservation practices within river fisheries seem to be a major issue though!

The run is seeming poor- that we all seem to know, yet many US subsistence fishers have met half of their needs- while practicing conservation measures though!

Canadian managers may step in if the run starts to look any worse than it is now and could consider shutting down our First Nation fisheries which have the authority to manage their own fishing activity.

Hmm, this sounds like a recipe for disaster. Do US managers still get paid when the stocks fail? How about Canadian managers? Balancing conservation (and a crisis) with people’s needs and leaving so much up to people who have real and perceived needs year after year, good run or poor or even in a year when there is a salmon crisis.

Who really is stepping up for these poor fish?

When is a crisis a true crisis and when is a crisis just a crude joke because of greedy people and inept management?

Add a comment

Commenting is no longer available for this story. Commenting expires 21 days after publishing.