Leef tries to kibosh robocall case
Mike Thomas/Yukon News

Yukon MP Ryan Leef.
Ryan Leef is one of seven MPs trying to quash the court action against their victories in last year’s federal election.
The Conservative MPs filed their motions in the Federal Court on May 18, before the long weekend, said executive director of the Council of Canadians, Garry Neil.
The council is footing the bill for the seven court challenges filed by nine individuals across Canada, including one in the Yukon.
“Under Canada’s Elections Act, an individual elector who has been the victim of fraud or is aware of fraud, corrupt or illegal activities that affected the results of a particular vote, can apply to the courts to have those results overturned,” said Neil.
In March, Leef issued a letter that asked his constituents to “let the evidence come out before jumping to any conclusions.
“If there have been any illegal acts, I strongly believe the matter should and will be dealt with according to law and that any group or individual found responsible should most certainly face the consequences for those acts,” the letter said.
Now, Leef and his Conservative colleagues are arguing that these court challenges shouldn’t be given any of the court’s time.
First off, they assert the challenges were made too late. The Elections Act says any grievances need to be brought forward within 30 days.
But it was only a few months ago when details about the alleged robocall scandal became publicly known, said Neil.
The Conservative MPs also assert that the court actions are frivolous and contemptuous, because they don’t represent enough voters to actually overturn the election results, said Neil.
“It’s childish lawyering,” said Neil. “We have polling data that the extent of the fraudulent calling was extensive, that it was targeted at supporters of the New Democratic Party, the Liberal Party and the Greens, and that it was effective. It actually affected the outcome and suppressed the voter turnout.
“This is our case and it’s up to the court to decide if our case has merit or not, it’s not up to you (the Conservative Party) to decide.”
Neil’s council expects more preliminary motions from the Conservatives to come, in an attempt to stall any legal investigation into the robocalls.
He also expects the Conservatives to tell the court that each of the seven challenges should be handled in their respective, local courts.
“Our argument is that much of the evidence is common,” said Neil. “It doesn’t make sense to force everybody to go to seven different hearings across the country when you do have a federal court.”
The case could be heard as early as Thursday, when court officials will decide on the first motions filed by the members, said Neil.
And depending on what happens, by the end of the week dates may be set to start hearing the robocall cases in court, he added.
Leef could not be reached for comment before press time. He was in constituent meetings and then traveling back to Ottawa, his office said.
But no possible explanation to try and stop the courts from hearing the robocall issue could suffice, said Neil.
“The Conservative Party has said it wants to get to the bottom of the robocalls affair. They encouraged people to go to Elections Canada. Well this also is a way to get to the bottom of it, so don’t stand in the way.
“Don’t obstruct having a court look at this seriously and consider whether this has happened, whether it’s been extensive and whether it’s affected the outcome. They can’t have it both ways.
“If you’ve got something to hide, which this would seem to indicate, that’s one thing, but if you want to get to the bottom of this, then don’t put these artificial roadblocks in the way.”
These court proceedings are separate from the investigation being conducted by Elections Canada into the seven ridings identified as areas where robocalls took place. That investigation is looking into whether there were any crimes committed under the Elections Act.
Contact Roxanne Stasyszyn at
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
9 Comments
MooseDR: that’s a good point. Do you happen to have a record handy of the incoming call that you got from a pollster? No? The reason for that should be obvious - they are not easy to obtain and perhaps the only people that have them are those that made the calls or for records to be obtained from the telephone company…hence the reason for the hearing and for the court to order the compilation of this evidence…or lack thereof.
Damage control time. Who will be the scapegoat?
A pollster asked me if I had been robocalled. I hadn’t, and said so. But I could easily see a sore looser say that they had even if they hadn’t. This is why such evidence would normally not be valid in court. It would be really nice if phone records could be produced that show a pattern whereby those who claimed robocalls actually received untraceable calls at the times that they claimed the calls happened. That is what real evidence looks like.
Not that Leef is the first politician to “flip flop” on an issue, but i too noticed that there was a CBC article where he was glad this was going before the courts. Now i believe he is being told to tow the same line as the rest of the Tories. He claims he doesn’t want to Canadian’s to burden this cost, but can you really put a price on democracy? Especially a democracy many Canadians feel has been tarnished? with a lack of a full public inquiry into this issue, i think the Council of Canadians is doing the right thing bringing robocalls to court. and the bottom line is: if the Conservative really had nothing to hide, they would welcome the court case. it’s just smart politics to do so. so, as they seem to be doing everything in there power to stop it…
Leef, The truth shall set you free. Time to “man up!”
Mixed messages seem to be an issue here. He claimed he was glad it was going to court, yet his lawyer files to have the challenge thrown out of court. I think his office should issue some clarification for us.
Don’t want the courts to find out that something was wrong with how the election was run in the territory, huh? At least you are done bullying the people that had issues with the last election and are now trying to bury it in court instead…..
I saw Leef quoted in a CBC article that he was “glad” this matter was before the courts, yet he and other MPs are apparently raising motions in an attempt to convince the courts to throw the matter out and not give it a hearing. That seems rather misleading. What exactly does Mr. Leef mean that he is “glad” about then, if he apparently isn’t glad that there is going to be a hearing? Is he glad that he has a chance to raise legal motions to stop the hearing and then claim that everything was dealt with in court?
This should prove to be a very interesting process with Leef pulling every trick in the book to hold onto his razor-thin victory.
Add a comment