Yukon News

Beta 3.0

Rents ratchet up

Roxanne Stasyszyn Friday June 8, 2012

Ian Stewart/Yukon News

P3rent

Ciara Stick's rent for her two-bedroom suite will go up $450. Rental rates for apartments in Whitehorse have been on a steady incline since 2004.

Ciara Stick came home from her Las Vegas vacation last week to find a notice from her landlord.

In September, her rent is going up by $450 a month.

Her neighbours received a similar notice, except their rent will jump by $600 a month, said Stick.

To be fair, Stick and her common-law husband, who rent the two-bedroom suite in downtown Whitehorse know they’ve been enjoying a pretty good deal. Their rent has stayed at $800 per month for the last five years.

And $1,250 a month really isn’t that bad for the spot, said Stick.

But she worries what similar increases will mean to other renters.

“What about all the single mothers out there?” she asked. “Where are those people going to go?

“It’s a huge concern, not just for me but for everybody. There are going to be more homeless and more people panhandling. We need to stop this.”

Rental rates for apartments in Whitehorse have steadily grown since 2004, said Gary Brown with the Yukon Bureau of Statistics.

In 2004, the median rent was $650 per month. As of March 2012, it sat at $825 per month.

Meanwhile, vacancy rates have “trailed off here in a big way,” said Brown.

In 1999 vacancy rates peaked at 19.7 per cent. But that number hasn’t been above four per cent since 2005, hitting an all-time low in 2010 with 0.6 per cent. It is currently 1.3 per cent.

But these numbers are all incomplete. They only count apartments and any building that contains three or more units under one roof. That means basement suites, duplexes, condo rentals and Stick’s suite aren’t included.

The cost of offering rental units has grown in recent years, said Kerry Lyle, president of the Yukon’s Residential Landlord Association.

Property assessments on Lyle’s units jumped by 18 per cent this year, and that’s going to drive up his taxes, he said. Utility charges and bank fees are also up.

“If it was affordable, people would be building rental units,” said Lyle. And, by and large, they’re not - at least not the more affordable, lower-end units.

Rental units tracked by the bureau of statistics surveys haven’t changed in a long while, sitting around 1,000 individual units, said Brown.

As supply has dried up, prices have soared. Likewise, rents for “higher end” units, like duplexes, basement apartments, condos and suites like Stick’s are also going up.

Sonny Gray, a Whitehorse property manager and condominium association organizer, has a good idea of what’s causing those rates to rise. In a word: “condominiumization.”

It’s not a new trend, but it is a very detrimental one for renters, he said.

It starts when a developer buys a big rental complex, like an apartment building. Upgrades are done. The building is rezoned as individual condos, and the developer sells each unit for a handsome profit.

The city also wins, by collecting a bigger share of property taxes.

Exacerbating the problem are property owners who buy affordable condos, then turn around and rent them, said Gray.

The city needs to stop allowing developers to turn all the existing rental units into condos, said Gray. He’d also like to see the territory create a law to regulate the number of renters in each condo complex, he said.

Rental rates for condos are usually not cheap. They can’t be, said Gray.

Owners must pay monthly condo fees on top of mortgage payments, taxes, utilities bills and repairs securities.

“If there’s nothing there on the municipal or territorial level to stop them,” said Gray, shrugging and raising his hands. “Heck, if I had the money, I’d do it.”

Condos offer a quicker return on investment than other developments, said Rich Thompson, CEO of Northern Vision Development.

His company bought the rental complex known as the Heights, tucked behind the Airport Chalet in Hillcrest, in 2007.

It then turned the 23 rental units into 21 condos. By 2009, Thompson’s company had sold about half of the condos to a mixture of people.

Some were looking for a condo to live in. Others wanted units to rent out. And some were Heights renters who wanted to start paying themselves, instead of a landlord.

“It’s not so simple to say condominiumization is a bad thing,” said Thompson, noting that it allows renters to become owners.

The last condos in the Heights sold in 2011, said Thompson. All were rental units until they sold, he added.

But Northern Vision did that deal back when the economy was a little “softer” than it is now, Thompson said. Demand has since grown.

Building costs are one of the biggest challenges in addressing the territory’s housing shortage, said Thompson. Pre-fabricated housing could be one fix.

A prefab industry could even be built in the territory, to ensure that jobs and profits stay here, said Thompson.

Stick also has a suggestion. She thinks the territory should cap the rent, like places Outside have.

Lyle disagrees. There’s no cap on property taxes, mortgage rates or utility charges, he said. And rent needs to cover those costs.

Gray agrees. For him, the only real answer is to build more apartments.

“There needs to be leadership,” he said. That applies on the city and territorial levels.

If the territory won’t build rental units, the city should go to Ottawa, he said.

“I’m a Conservative - I’ve voted for this government twice before, but I never will again,” Gray said of the Yukon Party.

He pointed to Premier Darrell Pasloski’s election promise to develop Lot 262, off Mountainview Road, into an affordable housing. During a recent call for bids, developers turned up their noses at the offer. The only two offers received were later disqualified because they required the territory to pitch in money.

“They’ve been asleep at the wheel,” said Gray.

If the government were serious about developing Lot 262, it would have given bigger incentives, like offering to bury utility lines at no cost to the developer, he said.

The current inaction “is not conservatism,” said Gray. “It’s blatant disregard for public.”

Contact Roxanne Stasyszyn at

.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

6 Comments

eesmith wrote:
9:30pm Friday June 15, 2012

The residents of Whitehorse and the Yukon Territory need to start lobbying the government hard for legislation that protects the rights of tenants.  Other regions of Canada have instituted legislation limiting rent increases to the national COL index, thereby making rent increases manageable and reasonable. In Ontario, the Landlord and Tenant Board determine the rent increase guideline using stats and not perception of market demand - by averaging the per cent change in the Ontario Consumer Price Index during the previous 12 months. (http://www.ltb.gov.on.ca/en/Key_Information/274235.html) If landlords want to increase any more than the guideline, they have to apply to the LTB and demonstrate why they need the increase and actually do repair work or improvements to the building!  The only people that the lack of legislation are protecting are the landlords and their pocketbooks, and while they may be the ones with the political connections, they are not the majority of the population.

Ken House wrote:
9:53pm Wednesday June 13, 2012

Well there is no hope in Sternwheeler Village in Riverdale, as Kare-away Homes and the Cunningham family informed the tenants on Monday Evening June 11, 2012, that they have bought the whole complex and is turning them into Condos.

So there are now 48 families and seniors that have to find another place to live.

Nice of the City of Whitehorse to approve this take-over and to allow this company to take low rental units and turn them into condos.  The Mayor and City Council I hope have a good explanation of this.

Ken House
Whitehorse

Randy Collins wrote:
6:24pm Wednesday June 13, 2012

Don’t get me wrong. I’m not using the Quebec protests as being right. I don’t agree that they have any right to complain about the lowest tuition rates in the country and I certainly agree that they are coming across as a bunch of spoiled brats. What I am stating is that the overall attitude, (not only in Canada, but all around the world) with politicians in general is a total disregard of the people who hired them. In other words the voters.

Riptide wrote:
5:54pm Wednesday June 13, 2012

Really? You’re going to use the Quebec students as an example? Even after the tuition increases have the lowest tuition in the country. So they want cheaper education. I’d like cheaper gas, less work, more pay, and better weather… does that mean I can protest too?

Randy Collins wrote:
5:19am Wednesday June 13, 2012

Is it just me or do I get the impression that our governments aren’t listening to the people who voted them into power. We have a housing crisis in the Yukon and the government does nothing. We have a agreed upon document for leaving the Peel alone and the government decides that it wants to develop it. We have protests in Quebec from students who are angry that the government isn’t listening to them. We have body mutilations, subway attacks, public shootings. All from people who are frustrated that the powers that be (politicians mostly) aren’t listening to concerns of the average person. It’s getting very scary out there

Riptide wrote:
11:50pm Monday June 11, 2012

“He’d also like to see the territory create a law to regulate the number of renters in each condo complex, he said.
If there’s nothing there on the municipal or territorial level to stop them,” said Gray, shrugging and raising his hands. “Heck, if I had the money, I’d do it.”

So you’d do it if you could afford to… but because you can’t, you don’t want me to do it either? I bought a condo because I couldn’t afford a 500k house. I rent out the condo (below market rates) and barely cover my expenses. The idea being that in 4-5 years I can sell the condo and my current place and between the equity and market, have a decent down payment on a real home. But you think that shouldn’t be allowed. Worse, not that it’s not allowed, but that only x% can do it… So how would that % be determined? And if I didn’t make the cut? I’d have to sell? Or move in?

If people want lower housing costs… then more houses need to be built, and they should have done that years ago - and didn’t. Everyone is now paying for that. If I had an empty place that I couldn’t rent for 1500… then I lower it until I can rent it. Even renting it at a loss is better than leaving it empty. Others would do the same. But the only way that happens is with more houses on the market. It all comes down to market and demand.

Add a comment

Commenting is no longer available for this story. Commenting expires 21 days after publishing.