Yukon gov’t caps oil and gas exploration complaints
Todd Korol/Reuters

An EnCana gas drilling well east of Calgary, Alberta, in 2007.
It was hot, cramped and noisy inside the Yukon Transportation Museum on Wednesday night as the territory’s oil and gas branch held its second public meeting about allowing industry to explore the Whitehorse Basin.
But it wasn’t what many attendees expected. When the oil and gas community meetings kicked off in Tagish last week, officials gave a presentation and then answered questions from the crowd.
But the Whitehorse meeting was instead staged as an open house. Attendees milled around a cramped room, lined with billboards that featured colourful geological maps.
Officials were on hand to answer questions, but none of them wore name tags and at times it was hard to identify who they were. And the acoustics of the room were such that it was hard to catch any conversation without standing immediately beside someone.
This arrangement left many people unhappy.
“This isn’t a public consultation. This is a trade show,” said Malcolm Mills. “We’re here to be spoon-fed by the industry.”
The meeting format was changed for the benefit of residents who may be uncomfortable speaking in front of a crowd, said Jesse Devost, a communications official with Energy, Mines and Resources.
Others wondered if the new format was to prevent the public from piling on criticisms, as had occurred in Tagish. The meeting location itself seemed a peculiar choice, being out of the way and off the transit routes.
Nonetheless, conservationists’ concerns dominated the evening event.
Cynicism was in the air, following the government’s push to open much of the Peel watershed up to development.
“It’s a smoke and mirrors game,” said Don Roberts. “I’m not blaming the people here, but the government is hiding and I think the real decisions have been made. It’s like the Peel: ‘We don’t care what you think, we’ll do it anyway.’”
“People feel betrayed now,” said Jim Tredger, NDP MLA for Mayo-Tatchun. “We have a rogue government and people are losing faith.”
Yukon Conservation Society executive director Karen Baltgailis echoed that sentiment.
“Why should people have any confidence they’ll be listened to? When the Yukon government uses taxpayers’ dollars to publish misleading advertisements on the Peel watershed? And after seven years of consultations, they’re ignoring all of it? Where’s the democracy?”
Natural gas has been touted by the Yukon Party government as one solution to the territory’s growing electricity pinch.
Gas is cheaper and cleaner than diesel fuel, which is currently burned to supply the territory’s electric grid during peak months of consumption. And producing gas in the territory would create jobs and reduce the need to truck fuel up the Alaska Highway.
But opponents warn that the landscapes of northern Alberta and B.C. have become badly scarred by oil and gas exploration and that the same could happen here.
Another big fear is that hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, could contaminate drinking water.
Comments written on a flipboard at the meeting were uniformly negative.
“No Whitehorse oil and gas exploration and development until after land use planning,” said one.
“Too bad we couldn’t ask questions publicly and everyone could hear answers,” said another.
“This is a sham. YTG will do what it wants.”
“Groundwater could easily be polluted by spills.”
“Where are our representatives hiding?”
Elke and Peter Huber came from Tagish to circulate a petition they helped to start. It calls on the legislative assembly to block oil and gas development.
“My feeling is they’d sell the northern lights to a billionaire if the price is right,” said Peter.
An oil and gas company would have to clear many hurdles before it could start exploring.
The government first needs to decide whether to grant oil and gas exploration rights for the Whitehorse Basin, which stretches from Carmacks to Carcross. That’s what the public is being consulted on now.
If this proceeds - which many at the meeting viewed as a foregone conclusion - then parcels would be granted to the highest bidder. Any company that secures rights still must clear the territory’s environmental reviews before it could do any exploration work.
In Tagish, officials tried to reassure a skeptical crowd that exploration work would only affect a tiny fraction of the territory.
“But 90 per cent of the population lives in the area,” countered Werner Rheine in Whitehorse.
Mills and many others were especially concerned with the prospect of fracking near Whitehorse.
It’s a method for extracting pockets of natural gas from shale deposits by blasting pressurized water, sand and chemicals deep underground.
The technology has triggered an exploration bonanza in the United States. It’s also, at times, polluted groundwater.
“If they start fracking within 500 kilometres of Whitehorse, we’re leaving,” said Mills.
He wondered whether water wells will be tested first to establish a baseline for any effects by industry.
Mills also noted that the oil and gas branch’s manager of rights and royalties, Debra Wortley, is soon leaving her job.
“We’re going ahead with it, and there’s no manager at the department,” said Mills. “There’s no captain of the ship and it’s full steam ahead.”
Wortley retires in September. And she’ll be taking a leave of absence in May, returning in June.
“But I have people in training and they’re here,” she said.
A meeting will be held in the Lake Laberge riding on Feb. 29 and in Carcross on March 7. Another meeting in Whitehorse is also expected later in March.
Contact John Thompson at
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
9 Comments
“Gas is cheaper and cleaner than diesel fuel, which is currently burned to supply the territory’s electric grid during peak months of consumption.” If we didn’t have to subsidize mining with our hydro electricity, then we wouldn’t need to burn diesel during “peak months of consumption”. The electric supply only became an issue when Victoria Gold came online.
It blows me away when I read comments about wanting to protect our “comfy Yukon lifestyle” and how fracking has been in use for however many decades.
Damn straight I’d like to protect my lifestyle….it’s comfy. And anyone who has actually done any research on fracking should be concerned; if even half of what I’ve read is at all accurate (if even 10 percent truthfully)then I think we should stay the hell away from any of that…the risk is too great and the consequences too dire. Are those who seem so sure fracking presents no real risk really THAT sure about it? Have you done your homework or are you just yappin’ off?
I can’t say with 100% certainty that my concerns over fracking up here are justified. But what I can say with 100% certainty is that history is littered with the arrogance and “certainty” of “experts” that are proven to be all about themselves or the money or their own arrogance. Face it…humans are constantly screwing up! What is ok today is an abomination 50 years from now. The status quo of today are the witch hunts, slave traders and culture rapers of tomorrow. It’s NEVER as simple as it would seem…EVER!
Check this lady out….she’s not alone.
http://www.watershedsentinel.ca/content/fracking-natural-gas-affects-water-quality
Once an aquifer is fubar’d it’s FUBAR’d. Are you so confident in government and big gas/oil that you would risk your children’s future or your own tap water on it?
The public plan developed over years of consultation called for 45% development in the Peel, I guess this is not compromise by those that where involved? What is the government plan? No limitations on development? Ignore everyone else, except of course mining interests.
As for Greenies what have they ever stopped? Slowed down maybe, drawn attention to but very seldom actually stop anything.
Also Fracking is still under scientific study in many jurisdictions even if it has been going on for 50 years, it is not yet an accepted technology by anyone other than the oil industry.
The pro development commenters don’t seem to realize that once you tear up the earth, the damage is done. Look at Faro. To show such scorn for your neighbours and their “comfy Yukon lifestyle” - do you mean tree covered mountains, lakes with edible fish, clean air- makes me wonder why they live in the Yukon - b/c they’ve already destroyed Alberta and BC? Revenue can be generated in other ways.
Does the news sensationalize environmental incidents? Ask the Americans about BP and Japan about Fukushima- when a “rare” incident has catastrophic results, reporting it does not make it sensationalism.
@ mlehner Just b/c you can’t see the damage doesn’t mean it’s not there.
I have no issue with development that is reasoned, rational and safe (I AM using a computer) BUT to avoid questions and serious discussion OR even ignore proposals that took years to develop does not sound like a compromise - it sounds like GREED. Despite the Wall Street collapse and EU defaults, we have not learned about sustainable development.
north of 60 hit the nail on the head. Blowing things out of proportion is a huge problem, especially for those that don’t understand how development works outside of reading about it in the newspaper.
We need compromise, I agree. But let’s be honest, the Peel alone is an area the size of Scotland. Can we not have some development, as well as “greenspace”, in an area the size of Scotland ? Does everyone actually REALLY believe that if development happens in the Peel, that you won’t be able to walk around there without seeing industry ? Seriously ? An area the size of Scotland and you truly believe that 100% of it is going to be covered in industry ?
I do hope the Yukon Party is a reasonable with the decision for oil and gas production as it was with the Peel.
My question is always why are the socalled greeners always so negative? do they not want compromise? does it always have to be their way or no way?
How would this kind of development make Yukon more self sufficient in Energy?
Unless we are prepared to put in Refinery capacity and Gas plants to process the gas, where will the product go, in a pipeline to the coast or south?
Canada exports most of it’s oil and gas production,and is in no way self sufficient in this area, if it was it would not import these products.
Hydraulic fracturing has been going on for years, but it is just since approx 2000 that it has been done to the extent it is being done now and there are still many studies going on to determine it’s effects on water aquifers etc. It is also being done in more populated areas, so maybe it’s effects are now being noticed more.
Nothing more than a bunch of NIMBYs who are quite happy to let the rest of Canada, and a significant amount of oil revenue, pay for their comfy Yukon lifestyle. The Yukon needs to become more self-sufficient in energy.
The environmental effects of hydraulic fracturing are blown entirely out of proportion. It’s been a common practice for half a century when bringing oil and gas wells to production. Environmental incidents are rare. All you hear about is what the news sensationalizes. People who get all upset over ‘fracking’ are only showing their ignorance.
I can’t believe this is even up for discussion! After living in the Yukon for 17 years and now living in Alberta, I see how the oil and gas industry is tearing up the earth so quick. It all just makes me “appreciate” the Yukon so much more, and now this? It’s beautiful country up North and I just cannot believe they are discussing such craziness!
Add a comment